|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: [MODELNAME] [DATE] [CALIBER] [message #52 is a reply to message #51] |
Thu, 09 May 2013 22:59   |
Gary
Messages: 2184 Registered: May 2013 Location: Seattle
|
Gruen Authority Cheerleader |
|
|
Bazzab wrote on Thu, 09 May 2013 22:52Jenneke wrote on Thu, 09 May 2013 18:36Bazzab wrote on Fri, 10 May 2013 00:25Sorry I thought you where talking about a Watch database, where known watches would be posted , not a newcomes ID section
First I was. But then Gary proposed to make a combined section. I think that can work well. Sorry for the confusion!
No Problem, I must admit I have doubts about a combined section, I was thinking the Watch database would be a Gruen Model Identification and if you cant find your watch there back to the ID section. The two together maybe come very messy?
Dont know!
B
I'll think about that one for awhile, play around a bit. Yes it could get messy. I'm thinking a moderator assigned to keep it clean, go back and fill in missing information in the template once identified. Yes, sleep on it.
|
|
|
Re: [MODELNAME] [DATE] [CALIBER] [message #77 is a reply to message #52] |
Sat, 11 May 2013 03:54   |
mikey
Messages: 709 Registered: May 2013 Location: Paris, Ontario
|
Gruen Master |
|
|
One thing i've found from another forum i moderate at is that it is imperative to use the "KISS" formula when setting things up so that no one gets befuddled. KISS = Keep It Stupidly Simple
That formula tends to reduce the workload for moderators & admins as things grow.
Still here....
|
|
|
|
Re: Watch Database [message #146 is a reply to message #107] |
Mon, 13 May 2013 02:09   |
mikey
Messages: 709 Registered: May 2013 Location: Paris, Ontario
|
Gruen Master |
|
|
What about separating the watches as entered in 'decade' categories? ie 1920's watches, 1930's watches etc... rather than just haphazardly entering them.
Still here....
|
|
|
|
Re: Watch Database [message #174 is a reply to message #172] |
Mon, 13 May 2013 23:54   |
Gary
Messages: 2184 Registered: May 2013 Location: Seattle
|
Gruen Authority Cheerleader |
|
|
Thojil wrote on Mon, 13 May 2013 21:25mikeyt wrote on Mon, 13 May 2013 04:09What about separating the watches as entered in 'decade' categories? ie 1920's watches, 1930's watches etc... rather than just haphazardly entering them.
Like this idea. At least for the models from 1935 to 1957 this categorisation could maybe be linked to the existing Style Number Dating Table. When entering the caliber/style number of a watch this could follow automatically through a look-up function?
I like the idea but you would surely confuse the new folks who want their watches identified. Where do I put it? We could create a new category with the decade model forums and have them accessible to the moderators only who would frequently take threads from the main forum and move them into the proper decade forums. The decade forum would be "read-only" for normal users to browse.
Thinking out loud here.
Never mind about thinking, take a look, too much?
[Updated on: Tue, 14 May 2013 00:09] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: Watch Database [message #176 is a reply to message #174] |
Tue, 14 May 2013 01:45   |
mikey
Messages: 709 Registered: May 2013 Location: Paris, Ontario
|
Gruen Master |
|
|
I really think you need to keep the 'please identify my watch' and the 'identified watches' database categories completely separate. I guess u could lock down the identified watch category initially until everyone becomes comfortable with the procedures.
Still here....
|
|
|
|
|